Lawson K Hart P, Zhang L.
An experiential model for teaching comparative systems
of medicine
University of Minnesota, Center for Spirituality
and Healing, MMC 505 Mayo, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis. MN 55455.
lawsonk@umn.edu
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of increasing
students' confidence in their knowledge about alternative systems of
medicine, through a 2 hour, experiential immersion in one alternative
system of health care (i.e. Traditional Chinese Medicine=TCM)
METHODS: In a course required for all first
year medical students, multiple teaching methods have been explored
for teaching about complementary and integrative medicine. In one session
identified as "Comparative Systems of Medicine," students are given
preparatory reading and web-based units on both Ayurvedic Medicine and
TCM, in addition to literature on "A shared language for comparative
medicine" (Cassidy 1996). Subsequently, all students are transported
to the campus of a local TCM school for a 90 min. session. Small groups
(6-8 medical students led by one senior TCM student) rotate through
a teaching area where each of them is able to experience hands-on, TCM
faculty-staffed, 15- minute stations in acupuncture, tui na, Chinese
nutrition and herbology, tongue and pulse diagnosis, moxibustion, and
cupping. Students completed a pre-event questionnaire after doing preparatory
reading, and a post-event questionnaire immediately after the site visit.
This has occurred for 3 consecutive years. All data reflect students'
self-evaluation of their "Levels of Confidence" with 0=none and 10=High.
Paired t-tests of pre and post data were done using STATA. Sample size
ranged from 171-184, with a response rate of 35-60% in differing years.
RESULTS: Students' increases in confidence levels
were significant (*p<0.01, **p<0.08) in the areas of:
1. Correct use of the language of comparative medicine (different comprehensive
healing systems).*
2. Knowledge of similarities and differences among Traditional Chinese
Medicine, Ayurvedic Medicine and the Biomedical Systems*
3. Knowledge of the scope & depth of training of CAM practitioners.*
4. Knowledge of the historical and cultural contexts, diagnostic approaches,
and therapeutic applications of Traditional Chinese Medicine*
5. Knowledge of the historical and cultural contexts, diagnostic approaches,
and therapeutic applications of Ayurvedic Medicine** Additionally, this
session is consistently the most well-attended session of this course.
CONCLUSIONS: Brief hands-on experiences within
a non-allopathic system of medicine increased students' confidence in
their knowledge in both that system, as well as, in another non-allopathic
system of medicine. This model is well-received by students, utilizes
existing community resources, and builds inter-institutional relationships.
Back