DISCUSSION Thursday, May 25, 11:00-12:30


Researching the Many Faces of Stress: It's Not Just in Your Mind

Speakers: Zofia Zukowska, MD, PhD, George Chrousos, MD, Richard McCarty, PhD, David Goldstein, MD, PhD.

Stress has many faces and yet no definition, or rather, it has many definitions and none that scientists could agree upon. The dictionary calls it "a mentally or emotionally disruptive or upsetting condition occurring in response to adverse external influences and capable of affecting physical health, usually characterized by increased heart rate, a rise in blood pressure, muscular tension, irritability, and depression". Stress has also been called a stimulus causing such a condition, as well as a state of extreme difficulty, pressure, or strain. Even without knowing what it is and how and why it happens, we know when we are stressed. The lack of scientifically based definition, however, has hampered research. At the same time, the demands for better understanding and management of stress are mounting, as stress is escalating worldwide.

The latest wave of terrorism, in particular, revealed that stress affects people's health not only acutely but also long-term, increasing incidence of mental, neurodegenerative and cardiovascular disorders. Even more moderate but chronic psychosocial stress is also implicated in growing mortality and morbidity from hypertension, coronary heart disease and stroke, as well as obesity. The latter is of particular importance as it has risen to epidemic proportion and affected not only adults but also children. Thus, the issue of stress management has become of utmost importance, and research into the mechanisms of stress and anti-stress modalities Ð an urgent mission for the scientific community. This session will provide a platform for discussion of some of the major opposing views in stress research, beginning with the time of Hans Selye.

In the first talk, George Chrousos will present those "Historic Aspects of the Development of the Stress Concepts," which led to a reductionist notion that stress can be defined by activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis (HPA) and the release of cortisol. This definition has dominated the field for many years, and to this day, the HPA axis is considered the dominant element of body's responses to stress. However, the understanding of how it contributes to development of diseases and how it acts, has changed, and now involves multiple interactions with other defense mechanisms such as immune system.

In the second talk, Zofia Zukowska will challenge the dominant role of the HPA axis and take upon herself to present another reductionist view of "Stress as the Neurogenic Response", and the critical role of the sympatho-adrenomedullary system. The traditional Cannon's "fight-and-flight" view of the system will be briefly presented to be replaced with a modern notion of patterned responses that the sympathetic nerves and the adrenal medulla elaborate in the face of different mental and physical stressors. How sympathetic nerves can elicit such differential responses will be discussed by describing the complexity of sympathetic neurotransmission, and multiple roles played by classical neurotransmitters, catecholamines, and the newly discovered co-transmitter, neuropeptide Y in health and diseases.

Then, Richard McCarty will present the psychologist's view on "Behavior: the Orphan Child of Stress Research." In it, he will explain how field of stress research has focused on physiology and failed to adequately incorporate behavioral variables that are integral to understanding the links between stress and disease, and how behavioral variables need to be fully integrated into theoretical perspectives and research designs to discover the interconnections between stress and health. Such an integrative approach to stress research requires a collaborative partnership between biomedical and behavioral scientists.

The last talk, by David Goldstein, will present a new integrative view of stress. In his "Homeostat Theory," he defines stress and distress, and discusses how prolonged activation of effectors to maintain allostasis during chronic stress contribute to development of diseases, by entailing decreased functioning of negative or positive feedback loops. Such a scientific integrative approach forms a framework of new era medicine, which emphasizes disorders of the multiple interacting systems that regulate the body's "inner world", explains diseases in terms of interactions among genetic makeup, life experiences, drug treatments, and time, with a goal of developing strategies to treat, prevent, or palliate complex, multi-system, "mind-body" disorders.

 

Back